U.S. House Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
New Legislation Requires Oil Industry to Update Spill Response Plans, Calls for Updated Federal & Regional Plans, and Safer Dispersants
Contact: Chairman Ed Markey, 202-225-4012
WASHINGTON (June 25, 2010) - Representative Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today introduced legislation that would finally push the oil industry to update their spill response plans. The oil spill response projects submitted by the major oil companies were, as the companies admitted in a June 15th hearing before Representative Markey's Energy and Environment Subcommittee, an embarrassment, and entirely inadequate to respond to a disastrous oil spill. Representative Markey revealed at that hearing that the companies' projects included scenarios to protect non-existent walruses in the Gulf of Mexico, and listed phone numbers for long-dead scientists.
"This bill will finally force the oil companies to put walruses back in the Arctic, and get real safety response projects in the Gulf," said Representative Markey, who chairs the Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the Energy and Business Committee. "It's time for oil companies to get serious about the real risks and challenges associated with oil disasters. The families living and working in the Gulf Coast deserve safety response projects that are iron clad, not boilerplate."
To bill text can be found HERE.
Investigations conducted by Chairman Markey, the Energy and Business Committee and others have revealed several notable and glaring problems associated with the oil companies' response plans, including:
--The oil companies' response projects contained scenarios to protect walruses, seals, and other species not found in the Gulf of Mexico.
--The oil companies' response projects contained the names and phone numbers of a long-dead expert.
--The oil companies' response projects contained a defunct Japanese website address for the corporation expected to provide response equipment.
--In its project specific to the Macondo well, BP said that even its worst-case spill would cause almost no environmental consequences.
--The oil companies' response projects contained no spill scenario modeling based on subsurface leaks or deepwater drilling activities.
--The dispersants that have been approved for use have not been tested to determine effects associated with sub-surface application or long-term use.
The legislation Representative Markey introduced today, called the Better Oil Spill Response Project Act of 2010, remedies these problems. It contains provisions to:
--Force the oil companies to provide the federal government with updated response projects within 6 months and periodically thereafter. The projects must include estimates of the worst-case scenarios for oil and gas drilling for various regions in the U.S., taking into account sub-surface and deep-water impacts.
--Require the federal government to revise regulations for the oil and gas companies' facility and vessel response projects within one year, making sure that these response projects will take the new worst case scenarios into account and that they are based on an accurate assessment of the geographic area where the rigs will be operating. The projects must include a demonstration and certification that the drilling operators can execute the plans. The president must approve these plans, and a provision that specified conditions for a presidential waiver of the Project approval requirement is struck. After 2 years, there must be an approved response Project for each facility or vessel owner.
--Require the federal government to update, within 9 months, its response Project and associated regulations, to take into account lessons learned from the Deepwater Horizon leak, the new worst case scenarios, and the recommendations of the independent commission investigating the BP spill. The president will also be required to revise the Project (and regulations, if necessary) whenever there is a material revision to the worst case scenario.
--Update regional projects within 18 months to take into account lessons learned from the Deepwater Horizon leak, the new worst case scenarios, the recommendations of the independent commission and the new federal plan. These will also need to be revised whenever there is a material revision to the worst case scenario or the federal plan.
--Strengthen the safety review and approval process for dispersants or other chemicals to evaluate, among other considerations, the long-term, sub-surface use of the chemicals. Publication of the chemical ingredients is required whenever a Spill of National Significance is declared.
--Ensure that having an approved response Project is made part of the leasing regulations associated with all drilling and production operations subject to this Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA).
Today Chairman Markey also introduced the "Stop Oil Spills Act," a bill to fund research into new oil spill prevention and response technologies. Read more about the bill here:
http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=4035&Itemid=125
