U.S. House Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
In Letter to BP, Congressman ask Oil Company to Accept 4.9 million barrel flow rate number produced by U.S. Scientific Team
August 11, 2010 - In response to silence from BP following the release of an official flow rate estimate produced by the U.S. Scientific Team's Flow Rate Technical Group (FRTG), Representative Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who chairs the House Energy and Environment Subcommittee and the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, is calling on the oil company to accept the 4.9 million barrel of oil number so that damage claims can move forward.
In a letter to BP's President and CEO Lamar McKay, Representative Markey cited BP's participation in the Unified Command process that produced the current estimate of 53,000 barrels of oil per day leaking from BP's well immediately preceding its closure using the capping stack. The FRTG also indicated that, at the beginning of the spill, 62,000 barrels per day were leaking from the well. Because the well flowed for 87 days, 4.9 million barrels flowed into the gulf. The FRTG estimate has a plus or minus ten percent uncertainty range.
"BP acceptance of a flow rate number is fundamental to its claim that it "is doing everything it can to make this right" for the families and businesses of the Gulf," said Markey. "Oil may have stopped flowing from the well, but the suffering in the region continues. Low-balling or litigating the flow rate estimate would be just one more insult to the people of the Gulf."
To read a copy of the letter to BP from Rep Markey, please click here.
Under current law, BP will be assessed fines for each barrel of oil spilled. These fines will range from a minimum of $1100 per barrel to up to $4300 per barrel. The amount of oil spilled will also be used in assessing the extent of natural resource damages. The 53,000-62,000 barrel per day figure far exceeds BP's initial estimates of 1000-5000 barrels per day and much more closely resembles the so called "worst case" scenario cited by BP officials of 60,000 barrels per day.
If BP is found guilty of gross negligence, the fines for the oil spill will increase. For instance, for every 10,000 barrels of oil spilled per day at $4,300 per barrel, over the in excess of 80 days that oil spilled into the ocean, the fine would be increased by $3.5 billion. The total size of the spill will also affect the amount of damages BP would have to pay for the spill's effect on natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
"BP bears the black eye of the worst environmental disaster in our nation's history," said Markey. "It's high time BP own up to the true size of this oil spill once and for all."
Full text of the letter follows:
August 11, 2010
Mr. Lamar McKay
President and CEO,
BP America, Incorporated
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas, 70779
Dear Mr. McKay:
On August 2, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon Unified Command released updated flow rate estimates for the amount of BP oil that flowed into the Gulf of Mexico prior to the initial capping of the Deepwater Horizon well on July 15, 2010. These estimates reflect the collaborative work and discussions of the National Incident Command's Flow Rate Technical Group (FRTG), led by U.S.G.S. Director Marcia McNutt, and a team of D.O.E. scientists and engineers, led by Energy Secretary Dr. Steven Chu.
According to the FRTG estimate, 53,000 barrels of oil per day were leaking from BP's well immediately preceding its closure using the capping stack. However, at the beginning of the spill, 62,000 barrels per day were leaking from the well. Because the well flowed for 87 days, approximately 4.9 million barrels flowed into the gulf. The FRTG estimate has a plus or minus ten percent uncertainty range.
As you know, BP is a participant in the Unified Command and assisted in the preparation of these estimates. BP has not publicly indicated disagreement with these estimates.
Under current law, BP will be assessed fines for each barrel of oil spilled. These fines will range from a minimum of $1100 per barrel to up to $4300 per barrel. The amount of oil spilled will also be used in assessing the extent of natural resource damages. The 53,000-62,000 barrel per day figure far exceeds BP's initial estimates of 1,000-5,000 barrels per day and much more closely resembles the so called "worst case" scenario cited by BP officials of 60,000 barrels per day.
I am writing to ask whether BP will accept this more definitive FRTG estimate as the basis for its per barrel spill liability and for other legal purposes, including the assessment of natural resources damages, as well. As is evident, each per day change in the flow rate, when compiled over the 87 day life of the spill, may be worth billions of dollars to BP if in fact it is found guilty of gross negligence with regard to this spill. For instance, for every 10,000 barrels of oil spilled per day at $4,300 per barrel, over the in excess of 80 days that oil spilled into the ocean, the fine would be increased by $3.5 billion. The total size of the spill will also affect the amount of damages BP would have to pay for the spill's effect on natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
BP's official website: (http://www.bp.com/extendedsectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=40&contentId=7061813a) declares that:
"BP is doing everything we can to make this right. We continue to work to stop the flow of oil, clean up the environmental damage, and help make sure that people are compensated for their losses."
A similar message has been conveyed through BP's extensive advertising campaign relating to its Gulf spill response activities. In light of BP's stated commitment to "make this right," the American public deserves to know whether BP projects on accepting the federal government's official flow-rate estimate for liability purposes or whether it projects on litigating this number and low-balling the amount of oil that actually flowed into the gulf. Accordingly it is incumbent upon BP to stipulate that it will accept the FRTG's latest flow rate estimates when the government looks for to collect its fine and assess other damages caused by the Deepwater Horizon Macondo well blowout. We know that this has been the worst environmental disaster in our nation's history and it is high time for BP to legally "own up" to that fact as well.
Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter. If you have any questions or concerns, please have your staff contact mine.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Markey
Chairman
Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Cc:
Honorable Henry Waxman, Chairman, Committee on Energy and Business
Honorable Joe Barton, Ranking Member
Honorable Fred Upton, Ranking Member
Dr. Marcia McNutt, U.S.G.S. and Chair, Flow Rate Technical Committee
