Latest Toxic Release Data for Connecticut Show Drop in Pollution Discharges; Multi-year Trend Continues in All New England States Under Community Right-To-Know
Category:Air Type: News Source: EPA Date: Wednesday, June 23rd, 2004
For Immediate Release: June 23, 2004; Release # 04-06-25
The most recent data show that delivers of toxic chemicals by industrial sources in all 6 New England states, including Connecticut, continue to decline.
The latest report of the Toxic Release Inventory, released today by EPA, confirms that for Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont there has been approximately a 90 percent decline in delivers of in excess of 650 tracked chemicals since 1988. In Connecticut, total delivers have declined by 93.7 percent overall since 1988. Nationally, chemical delivers have declined by approximately 57 percent.
These data, made accessible each year to the public and communities throughout the U.S., covers pollution delivers to air, water and land by power plants, manufacturers and other facilities which employee 10 or more workers and exceed thresholds for TRI chemicals. During 2002, just under 24.9 million pounds of chemicals were released in the 6 New England states, with Connecticut's release figure at approximately 4.4 million pounds. Of Connecticut's releases, 83 percent were emitted to the air during 2002.
"Each of the New England states, including Connecticut, continue to see declining levels of emissions, even as the number of facilities reporting has increased," said Robert W. Varney, Regional Administrator for EPA's New England Office. "It is extremely important for the public to know what chemicals are being released in and near their communities. Careful analysis of this data confirms that over time, the amount of toxic substances released to the air, land and water continue to decline in our states."
The list of chemicals emitted, and facilities required to report, has expanded a number of times since the Toxic Release Inventory was begun in 1988. Comparing delivers in 2002 of only those chemicals and industry sectors reported in 1988 show a decline of 57.4 percent nationwide, and a drop of 93.7 percent in Connecticut.
"We continue to see significant reductions in the levels of toxics released to the environment in Connecticut," said Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Arthur J. Rocque, Jr. "Over the past decade, a tremendous amount of progress has been made in developing cleaner technologies which, complemented by stringent pollution control initiatives, have contributed to cleaner lakes and rivers, improved habitat, and cleaner air for residents of Connecticut to breathe. We will continue to develop and promote initiatives that further our natural resource protection efforts and to build on the environmental gains achieved over the last 10 years."
The current data, for the year 2002, represent the 3rd year that reporting has been required for a group of persistent and bioaccumulative toxins (PBTs) that includes mercury, dioxins, PCBs and polycyclic aromatic compounds. This is the 2nd year that reporting has been required for lead and lead compounds. Persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals do not readily break down in the environment and can build up in living organisms, especially higher in the food chain in fish, wildlife and other animals, and humans. In Connecticut, 9,560 pounds of PBTs were released to the environment of which 31.3 percent were lead or lead compounds (2,988 lbs). In 2002, facilities in Connecticut released 118 pounds of mercury, 5.9 grams of dioxins and 6,387 pounds of polycyclic aromatic compounds.
Today's data includes information on delivers and other wastes in excess of 650 chemicals and chemical categories that companies are required to report under EPA's TRI Program. The data includes toxics released at the company's facility and those transported to disposal facilities off site. All manufacturing companies, as well as coal and oil fired power plants, that produce or use above the threshold limit for any chemical are required to participate. Thresholds range from thousands of pounds to 100 or 10 pounds for PBTs, down to 0.1 grams for dioxin-like compounds.
The top 5 chemicals released to the environment during 2002 in Connecticut were:
Nitrate Compounds (741,658 lbs.)
Toluene (527,305 lbs.)
Hydrochloric Acid (485,196 lbs.)
ChloroDiFluorethane (437,06 1lbs.)
Dichloromethane (366,810 lbs.).
The following is a list of Connecticut's ten biggest on- and off-site emitters of the toxic chemicals. No attempt has been made to adjust the totals to reflect the relative seriousness of the chemicals emitted. It is important to note that these chemical emissions are reported to E.P.A. under the TRI and do not reflect illegal discharges of pollutants to the environment, nor do these figures identify any potential risk of exposure to members of the communities. Also, yearly delivers can vary due to factors such as power outages, production variability, etc., that do not reflect the facility's pollution prevention program(s).
Facility
Pounds released
Difference from 2001
Dow N.A. Allyn's Point Plant, Gales Ferry
490,294
- 18,294
Pfizer Incorporated Groton Site, Groton
299,017
- 47,628
PSEG Power Connecticut Bridgeport Harbor Station
293,684
- 692,172
Spongex Int. Ltd., Shelton
284,200
- 27,251
Cytec Inds. Inc., Wallingford
269,791
+ 23,965
Summit Corporation of America, Thomaston
190,971
+ 26,595
Tyco Healthcare Group Surgical Div., North Haven
155,120
+ 20,660
Olin Corporation Somers Thin Strip, Waterbury
115,822
- 36,608
Quality Rolling & Deburring Co. Inc., Thomaston
114,443
+ 91,453
Seidel Inc., Waterbury
99,558
+ 6,400
The reporting of data to the Toxics Release Inventory is required under the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, passed in 1986. The TRI provides the amount, location and type of release to the environment -- whether a pollutant is emitted into the air, discharged into the water, or released onto the land. It also includes information on waste shipped off-site for disposal or further treatment. The TRI has been credited with arming communities with valuable knowledge and encouraging facilities to reduce their delivers of toxic chemicals into the environment through source reduction, or pollution prevention, measures.
Anybody is now able to access TRI data using an online tool called TRI Explorer. Using this, interested parties can search TRI data and generate 4 type of reports: state fact sheets, release reports, waste transfer reports and waste quantity reports. Information can be accessed for specific states, chemicals, years, media or industrial sectors. TRI Explorer and additional information on the TRI plan are accessible at: http://www.epa.gov/tri .
To increase savings, reduce the time delay before your equipment reverts to a power saving mode. This can also be set in the Power Options menu in your PC’s Control Panel.
Featured Report
CO2 Emissions by Fuel
View the total CO2 emissions broken down by Coal, Petroleum, and Natural Gas
Environment New Jersey Holds Clean Air Rally Wednesday The RGGI program caps power plant pollution, requires polluters to pay for fouling our air, and invests that money in clean energy, according to ENJ. "Senator (Tom) Kean Jr. (R-21) voted the wrong way and that's why we are coming to Westfield to ...Federal Air Marshals Face A Hostile Work Environment, ABC News Reports He told ABC, "Sooner or later, if you do not have people operating at their peak efficiency, then you take the risk that a terrorist is going to get away with his dirty deed." The 118-page report, which is to be made public on Thursday, reveals that ...India sinks on Yale Environment Index as air pollution worsens The main reason for pollution is the high density of the population living in the city and the dumping of untreated water and waste into the river. As per the figures, Delhi alone contributes around 3296 MLD (million liters per day) of sewage in the ...